The Design Review rubric includes thirteen evaluative criteria organized into four broad categories. For each category, a rating of Limited (
), Moderate ( ), or Strong ( ) is assigned based upon a review of programmatic materials and correspondence with program leadership.
Program Design Framework & Process
Program Content Selection & Design
Program Evaluation
Materials Interface / Design
A clearly articulated ToA or Logic Model establishes a clear problem statement, the inputs (activities), and the outputs (short- intermediate- and long-term outcomes). Intervene K-12 has developed a model to be used to frame their programmatic design, as measured by formalized data-driven instruction and company ambitions, such as the expansion of partnerships, and a instructional needs for students with a range of abilities and backgrounds. Program developers use a welldocumented process of curriculum development, crosswalking, question writing, and thorough editing to ensure that instructional materials align with any state based on district needs, including but not limited to Common Core State Standards (CCSS), Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS), and New York’s Next Generation Learning Standards. Course sequencing is highly structured and paced for learner success. Importantly, learner growth is monitored and benchmarked using adaptive, flexible instruction to differentiate instruction and meet individual needs based on prerequisite knowledge. Program materials are highly responsive to evolving standards and state and districts’ needs.
At Intervene K-12, a content team comprised of current and former educators constantly evaluates instructional content for accuracy and tutors for quality assurance. We monitor user performance data as an indicator of program effectiveness, and a more formalized and rigorous summative evaluation is currently being developed. Our rigorous research agenda, which includes the design process used to develop, evaluate, and refine existing materials, is in accord with the final version of the Logic Model. Intervene K-12 relies on the High Impact / High Dosage Tutoring Model to guide our program development.
Intervene K-12 program design addresses specific curricular and underway to test the program’s efficacy. We encourage the developers to devise and follow through with the summative evaluation plan and continue to document the effectiveness of the program, identifying areas for improvement.
Costs and resources for adopting Intervene K-12 are customizable depending on the needs of the client and of the learner population. Intervene K-12 offers flexible pricing and works with all types of grants and funding sources. There is ample opportunity to contact a representative from Intervene K-12 in a variety of ways (phone, email, chat). Support for Intervene K-12 users is timely, and learners receive clear and relevant feedback about their performance in the program. Specifically, the Data Dashboard and the District Data Dash were designed to provide extensive analysis of learner performance, which is available to teachers and administrators.
Johns Hopkins Program Evaluation File
Our team of high-impact tutoring experts consults and collaborates with K-12 school and district leaders to design partnered programs that accelerate learning outcomes with priority student cohorts.
Typically, we start by gathering some basic information about you and your school or district’s challenges and goals.
Fill out the form to connect with our team today!
Our team of high-impact tutoring experts consults and collaborates with k12 school and district leaders to design partnered programs that accelerate learning outcomes with priority student cohorts.
Typically, we start by gathering some basic information about you and your school or district’s challenges and goals.
Fill out the form to connect with our team today!
